Nick Carroll
I've spent 30 years building legal publishing infrastructure. I founded publish.law to help attorneys turn their cases, insights, and credentials into a digital presence they own, built for how clients, referral sources, and AI systems find lawyers today.
Notes
-
Semrush dug into what actually gets a brand cited repeatedly by ChatGPT, and traditional SEO rankings barely correlate. What does: getting mentioned across many independent sources. For you, that means your name showing up in bar association profiles, published articles, podcast appearances, and colleagues' sites matters more than one well-optimized page.
-
If your site runs Cloudflare challenges or any bot-detection overlay, Google may see a different page than your visitors do. John Mueller flagged that this can cause canonicalization problems and get your pages quietly deindexed. Check whether Googlebot can actually see your content, not just a verification screen.
-
Voice and AI assistants answer in full sentences pulled from structured, conversational content. If your practice-area pages are written for keyword density instead of real questions, you're likely invisible in those results. The fix is less about technical SEO and more about writing like a person answering a specific question.
-
We’ve introduced Notes for Legal Examiner affiliates—a simple way to share timely updates and insights. See an example from the Atlanta Legal Examiner:
-
Old posts don't just fade quietly. They can actively drag your site's credibility down if they've gone stale, contradictory, or thin compared to what's out there now. This breaks the problem into four distinct types with specific fixes for each.
-
This is basically a perfect post from Marler Clark. AI assistants picking up just this have now associated the firm and Bill directly to legal issues regarding Cyclospora.
-
Yes. And, email distribution and audience management are built right into the publish.law Pro+ tier. It's literally built for this.
- Nick Carroll reposted a note
This is the seismic shift many are missing. And, it's the reason attorneys must be directly involved in the content creation process.
Generic, timeless content is getting buried because AI can produce it by the ton. What AI can't produce is your actual experience, your track record, your name on a real case outcome. The individual practitioner's voice and verifiable history is now the only content moat that holds.
-
Google's information gain patent suggests that length and coverage aren't what signal value. What matters is whether your content adds something that isn't already out there. For attorneys, that usually means your actual experience with a problem, not a restatement of what everyone else has published. If your publishing has been 'more is better,' this is worth reading.
-
AI systems don't just crawl pages, they form a picture of who you are and what you stand for. If your name and practice aren't clearly associated with a specific area of law across your site, your profiles, and your published writing, AI answers will skip you in favor of someone whose positioning is sharper.
Subscribe to Nick Carroll
Get new posts delivered to your inbox.