Nick Carroll
I've spent 30 years building legal publishing infrastructure. I founded publish.law to help attorneys turn their cases, insights, and credentials into a digital presence they own, built for how clients, referral sources, and AI systems find lawyers today.
Notes
-
This is basically a perfect post from Marler Clark. AI assistants picking up just this have now associated the firm and Bill directly to legal issues regarding Cyclospora.
-
Yes. And, email distribution and audience management are built right into the publish.law Pro+ tier. It's literally built for this.
- Nick Carroll reposted a note
This is the seismic shift many are missing. And, it's the reason attorneys must be directly involved in the content creation process.
Generic, timeless content is getting buried because AI can produce it by the ton. What AI can't produce is your actual experience, your track record, your name on a real case outcome. The individual practitioner's voice and verifiable history is now the only content moat that holds.
-
Google's information gain patent suggests that length and coverage aren't what signal value. What matters is whether your content adds something that isn't already out there. For attorneys, that usually means your actual experience with a problem, not a restatement of what everyone else has published. If your publishing has been 'more is better,' this is worth reading.
-
AI systems don't just crawl pages, they form a picture of who you are and what you stand for. If your name and practice aren't clearly associated with a specific area of law across your site, your profiles, and your published writing, AI answers will skip you in favor of someone whose positioning is sharper.
-
The hardest part of investing time in generative engine optimization is that the payoff doesn't show up cleanly in your analytics. This piece walks through how to measure progress even when direct attribution is messy, useful if you're trying to decide whether your writing and publishing work is actually moving the needle.
-
Before you pay for a tool that tracks whether you're showing up in AI answers, read this. New research found that AI visibility scores swing so much between checks that most of the movement is just noise, not real signal. The implication: build your presence, but don't obsess over the weekly numbers.
-
Your traffic numbers can look perfectly normal while AI search quietly stops pulling from your site altogether. The piece covers how AI systems gradually favor a shrinking pool of sources, and if your name and writing aren't already in that pool, good stats won't save you. Worth reading before you assume things are fine.
-
ChatGPT doesn't always pull from the same sources. Backend pipelines shift without notice, and citations shift with them. That means checking once whether you show up isn't enough. It also means the most durable play is being cited across multiple sources, not just one, so your name travels no matter which pipeline is active.
-
This explains the actual mechanism AI search uses to decide what to cite. If you want your name showing up in AI-generated answers, understanding RAG is the starting point. Short version: AI doesn't crawl everything, it retrieves from an index it trusts. Getting into that index, under your name, is the whole game.
Subscribe to Nick Carroll
Get new posts delivered to your inbox.